Analysis of tax and benefit changes in the autumn statement
In this short briefing paper, IPPR projects the consequences of the changes to tax allowances and the uprating of benefits that were announced in last year's autumn statement.
In the 2012 autumn statement, the chancellor George Osborne announced several important changes to the tax and benefit system, which will come into force in April 2013, including increases in the higher-rate threshold and personal allowance for income tax and changes to the rate of increase for many benefits and tax credits.
Looking forward to 2017/18, IPPR has compared the effects under the proposed changes by comparison with a 'status quo' scenario.
Key findings include:
- Reforms to welfare made in the 2012 autumn statement will increase the number of children living in poverty by 200,000 in 2017/18. By limiting rises in the value of most working-age benefits to 1 per cent for three years, as opposed to linking their increases to inflation, the amount of support given to low-income families in real terms will fall significantly. This change will push many families and children into relative poverty. The numbers of children, adults and households in poverty will all rise by 200,000.
- By 2017/18, reforms to personal taxes made in the 2012 autumn statement will provide the greatest benefit to those on middle incomes, but will not reverse the impact of real cuts to welfare. For households in the middle of the income distribution, the increase in the personal allowance will provide a small increase to incomes. But the poorest households gain less from this change, and households in almost all sections of the income distribution will see a greater amount taken away through the 1 per cent cap on benefits uprating than is handed to them via personal tax reform.
- The combined changes to taxes and benefits will have an impact on families both in and out of work. As a proportion of income, the changes will have the greatest impact on those out of work, who will see their incomes fall on average by 0.44 per cent. But in real cash terms, the amount that families who are in work will lose is larger, at an average of £1.50 a week.
Spencer Thompson, Economic Analyst
In the news
Why Labour would not reverse the coalition's child benefit cuts
New Statesman, Staggers blog - 05 Jun 2013
You may be interested in...
IPPR in the news
Making it hard for politicians to ignore the young
Telegraph - 07 Mar 2014£100bn red alert over green energy gap
The Independent - 06 Mar 2014Impact of immigrants on British workers ‘negligible’
The Independent - 06 Mar 2014Will Straw on moving beyond coal power
Guardian - 04 Mar 2014
Ed Cox on Why London is such a powerful force in the UK (2.55 in)
BBC Today - 04 Mar 2014The north holds the key to a better economy
Manchester Everning News - 04 Mar 2014Net migration soars despite Cameron's pledge
Daily Telegraph - 28 Feb 2014NEET generation
The Independent - 27 Feb 2014
More BBC indie commissions, report says
Radio Today - 27 Feb 2014BBC boss wants to extend licence fee to cover iPlayer
Daily Mirror - 27 Feb 2014Scotland: Vote 'Yes' and lose the BBC
The Independent - 27 Feb 2014Indy Scotland would be a vote to “leave” the BBC
The Scotsman - 27 Feb 2014
Tony Hall: extend licence fee to cover iPlayer
The Guardian - 27 Feb 2014Maria Miller says independent Scotland would lose the BBC
The Guardian - 27 Feb 2014Hall vows to protect drama under further cost-cutting
The Stage - 27 Feb 2014Hall proposes licence fee extension to include iPlayer
BBC News Online - 27 Feb 2014
Harman at OMC: 'Daily Mail should apologise'
The Guardian - 27 Feb 2014Time to break London's grip on creative industries
BBC Wales Today - 25 Feb 2014UK's creative industries 'must back regional and ethnic diversity'
The Guardian - 25 Feb 2014Creative industries need to be freed from London's 'closed shop'
WalesOnline - 25 Feb 2014