Analysis of tax and benefit changes in the autumn statement
In this short briefing paper, IPPR projects the consequences of the changes to tax allowances and the uprating of benefits that were announced in last year's autumn statement.
In the 2012 autumn statement, the chancellor George Osborne announced several important changes to the tax and benefit system, which will come into force in April 2013, including increases in the higher-rate threshold and personal allowance for income tax and changes to the rate of increase for many benefits and tax credits.
Looking forward to 2017/18, IPPR has compared the effects under the proposed changes by comparison with a 'status quo' scenario.
Key findings include:
- Reforms to welfare made in the 2012 autumn statement will increase the number of children living in poverty by 200,000 in 2017/18. By limiting rises in the value of most working-age benefits to 1 per cent for three years, as opposed to linking their increases to inflation, the amount of support given to low-income families in real terms will fall significantly. This change will push many families and children into relative poverty. The numbers of children, adults and households in poverty will all rise by 200,000.
- By 2017/18, reforms to personal taxes made in the 2012 autumn statement will provide the greatest benefit to those on middle incomes, but will not reverse the impact of real cuts to welfare. For households in the middle of the income distribution, the increase in the personal allowance will provide a small increase to incomes. But the poorest households gain less from this change, and households in almost all sections of the income distribution will see a greater amount taken away through the 1 per cent cap on benefits uprating than is handed to them via personal tax reform.
- The combined changes to taxes and benefits will have an impact on families both in and out of work. As a proportion of income, the changes will have the greatest impact on those out of work, who will see their incomes fall on average by 0.44 per cent. But in real cash terms, the amount that families who are in work will lose is larger, at an average of £1.50 a week.
Spencer Thompson, Economic Analyst
In the news
Why Labour would not reverse the coalition's child benefit cuts
New Statesman, Staggers blog - 05 Jun 2013
You may be interested in...
IPPR in the news
Spencer Thompson on small firms, jobs and sick pay (7min)
BBC Radio Essex - 22 Apr 2014Graeme Cooke on alternatives to payday lenders (45min)
BBC Radio 4 Today - 22 Apr 20141% increase in NI rates could bring in £4bn each year for NHS
The Independent - 22 Apr 2014One-off payday-loan levy would help fund affordable lending
The Guardian - 21 Apr 2014
Church of Scotland welcomes IPPR plan for affordable lenders
The Herald - 21 Apr 2014Call for clampdown on payday lenders
The Times - 21 Apr 2014We must do everything we can to help SMEs carry on the good work
The Independent - 21 Apr 2014Most of these elderly people have a simple need – not to be on their own
The Observer - 20 Apr 2014
One in four small firms plans to hire this year
The Telegraph - 19 Apr 2014Wales says no to Scottish independence
WalesOnline - 19 Apr 2014Ministers are 'not trusted'
Daily Mirror - 14 Apr 2014A real alternative to loan sharks
Sunday People - 14 Apr 2014
Politicians of all stripes suffer sharp fall in trust
Telegraph - 14 Apr 201436% have faith in the parliamentary system
Metro - 14 Apr 2014Labour pledges to introduce Regional Ministers
ITV News - 09 Apr 2014Putting the voice of English regions at the heart of decision-making
The Independent - 09 Apr 2014
Labour's plan to 'bust open' civil service
Guardian - 09 Apr 2014Young electorate showing disenchantment with today’s politics
Financial Times - 08 Apr 2014Labour's plans to boost Whitehall diversity
Evening Standard - 07 Apr 2014Dugher plan to 'bust open' Whitehall to 'working class'
BBC News Website - 07 Apr 2014