England and the Union: How and why to answer the West Lothian question
This report recommends a series of changes to existing procedures within the UK parliament to overcome the practical implications of the West Lothian question, which asks how can it be right after devolution that non-English MPs still get to vote on English domestic matters. The proposed solution includes a vote in the House of Commons to determine whether a bill should be treated 'as if' it applied to England only and the creation of a new 'English grand committee' to conduct the usual report stage for such 'England-only' bills.
The West Lothian question is an anomaly. It follows from having devolved legislatures for some of the UK but not for England.
Today, there are three factors at play which, taken together, might elevate the question from a theoretical anomaly into an issue that demands an answer: political divergence within the British union, the number and significance of various national groups of MPs, and whether or not the English people themselves see it as a problem.
Now, a strong case can be made for addressing the question: perhaps most importantly, English voters may be beginning to see themselves as a political unit, and three-quarters of them think that this matters. It is arguably better to accommodate measured change now than to be forced into something damaging, in an unmanaged way, at a later date.
The report weighs procedural change against other options, including increased English regionalism, the creation of an English parliament and a 'devolution discount' on non-English MPs in the Commons, and also assesses two earlier proposals for similar change, made by Sir Malcolm Rifkind in 2007 and Kenneth Clarke in 2008.
In the news
A step closer to English votes on English laws?
Conservativehome - 25 Mar 2013
You may be interested in...
IPPR in the news
UK higher education: let's not follow the leader but develop our own vision
The Guardian - 22 May 2013Mervyn King's housing warning is too little, too late
The Guardian - 21 May 2013Nigel Farage and Alex Salmond trade insults in battle of nationalists
The Guardian - 20 May 2013Local solutions are the key to full employment
New Statesman, Staggers blog - 20 May 2013
Exam fail kids are facing jobs woe
The Sun - 15 May 2013Will Ed Miliband be the Doctor Who of politics?
The Telegraph - 14 May 2013Labour will not be able to meet child poverty targets, says thinktank chief
The Guardian - 13 May 2013Slave-to-work dads ‘being squeezed out of family life,' says MP Jon Cruddas
Manchester Evening News - 13 May 2013
Laptop U: Has the future of college moved online?
The New Yorker - 13 May 2013Ed Cox on 'two-speed Britain'
Observer - 12 May 2013Francis Maude to consider fixed terms for top mandarins
Financial Times (£) - 12 May 2013Childcare reforms in chaos
Daily Mirror - 10 May 2013
Sarah Mulley on the Queen's speech (2 mins 55s)
Channel 4 News - 09 May 2013Queen's Speech 2013: Economist Attacks Immigration Curbs
Huffington Post - 09 May 2013Follow Macmillan and build, build, build
New Statesman - 08 May 2013School inspections deeply toxic, thinktank says
The Guardian - 08 May 2013
School League Tables Damaging To Students' Vocational Education, Warns IPPR
Huffington Post - 08 May 2013A common sense policy to create jobs and combat what ails Britain
The Independent - 07 May 2013250,000 children could suffer due to league table changes
The Telegraph - 07 May 2013Tories braced for big losses in council polls
The Guardian - 03 May 2013