A Good Choice for Mental Health

Article

The third paper in ippr's Mental Health in the Mainstream series looks at options for extending the choice agenda to mental health services.

In mental health, the choice agenda has had a different evolution to the rest of the NHS. People with mental health problems have been stigmatised, subject to poor practice or not taken seriously. The underlying assumption of past mental health services was that patients were unable to make choices. Also unique to mental health are the coercive aspects of the service. As such, choice poses a significant challenge to established ways of delivering services and interacting with people. In the long run, the concept of choice could have a transformative effect, both on how mental health services work, as well as how society responds to mental health problems. These are the themes that this paper explores.

Related items

  1. Two male construction workers in high vis jackets laughing together in a van

    Mission-driven industrial relations: The case for fair pay agreements

    How fair pay agreements could support the government’s mission-based approach by resolving labour market challenges.

  2. Women in Scotland: the gendered impact of care on financial stability and well-being

    Women in Scotland are far likelier than men to take on childcare and other caring responsibilities, which puts them at an economic disadvantage. 
  3. One person handing a blue UK passport to another

    Citizenship: A race to the bottom?

    The ability to move from temporary immigration status to settlement, and ultimately to citizenship, is the cornerstone of a fair and functional immigration system.