Alternatives to Child Immigration Detention: What are the options for the Coalition government?
Article
We believe the government deserves credit for confirming that they will end this inhumane and ineffective policy, and for establishing a review into alternatives to the practice. However, ending child detention clearly raises significant challenges for the government which are proving difficult to overcome.
This briefing provides some background to the developments in this area, and sets out how two important principles can and should be put into practice by the government.
Those principles are:
- first, ending the detention of children must mean ending the detention of families.
- second, the government is entitled to remove families with children from the UK once they have exhausted their rights of appeal, and any change in policy must facilitate rather than frustrate return in these circumstances.
Recommendations in the briefing paper include:
- formalising the involvement of refugee and migrant-supporting organisations
- ensuring asylum seekers are aware of the possibility of return early in the asylum process
- the use of alternatives to detention, such as tagging and reporting, and
- ensuring the government is able to enforce returns.
Related items
Mission-driven industrial relations: The case for fair pay agreements
How fair pay agreements could support the government’s mission-based approach by resolving labour market challenges.Women in Scotland: the gendered impact of care on financial stability and well-being
Women in Scotland are far likelier than men to take on childcare and other caring responsibilities, which puts them at an economic disadvantage.ÂCitizenship: A race to the bottom?
The ability to move from temporary immigration status to settlement, and ultimately to citizenship, is the cornerstone of a fair and functional immigration system.