Autumn statement 2011
Article
This was more like a mini-budget than an autumn statement. The likelihood that the OBR's forecasts - and particularly its downgrading of the growth outlook - would dominate the next day's headlines caused the government to preannounce a series of measures designed to support growth. The aim, no doubt, was to give the impression that the government had a 'plan for growth' as well as a 'plan for deficit reduction'.
However, it is not enough to agree a number of measures - even if some of them are welcome U-turns from the government's previous position - and call them a 'plan for growth'. A real plan for growth should start by identifying what is needed for the economy to grow.
In the short term that means generating additional demand. With our main export market heading into recession and household and business confidence low, only the government is in a position to provide this extra demand. However, this would mean relaxing the pace of deficit reduction; that was a U-turn that the chancellor was not prepared to make on this occasion.
Related items
Mission-driven industrial relations: The case for fair pay agreements
How fair pay agreements could support the government’s mission-based approach by resolving labour market challenges.Women in Scotland: the gendered impact of care on financial stability and well-being
Women in Scotland are far likelier than men to take on childcare and other caring responsibilities, which puts them at an economic disadvantage.ÂCitizenship: A race to the bottom?
The ability to move from temporary immigration status to settlement, and ultimately to citizenship, is the cornerstone of a fair and functional immigration system.