Devolution in Practice 2006
Article
"A perceptive, pioneering analysis of the policy consequences flowing from devolution across the UK."
Wendy Alexander MSP
"Most Westminster based politicians and journalists are ignorant about the impact of devolution. They should read this new collection, which goes beyond the constitutional debate to look at important differences in policies and policymaking, as well as common values, attitudes and pressures across the whole UK. This has direct implications for the debate over decentralisation in England."
Peter Riddell, Chief Political Commentator of The Times and Chair of the advisory board of the ESRC research programme on devolution.
"Mark I of ippr's study of the effects of devolution
explored the development of differences both of policy and process between the 'national' administrations. Mark II pursues this theme further, but perhaps more importantly begins to anticipate the problems of an inadequate constitutional framework. In the absence of constitutional protection for minimum common standards, the influence of England's choices on the funding formula may prove to be the critical determinant of the options for the rest. The dreaded West Lothian Question is likely to be raised in
earnest.Watch out for Mark III."
James Cornford, Founder Director of ippr
Related items
Women in Scotland: the gendered impact of care on financial stability and well-being
Women in Scotland are far likelier than men to take on childcare and other caring responsibilities, which puts them at an economic disadvantage.Citizenship: A race to the bottom?
The ability to move from temporary immigration status to settlement, and ultimately to citizenship, is the cornerstone of a fair and functional immigration system.Reflections on International Women's Day 2025
In a world that currently seems increasingly dominated by ‘strong man’ politics and macho posturing, this International Women’s Day it seems more important than ever to take stock of where we are on the representation of women in politics.