More than one English question
Article
As we reach the tenth anniversary of the devolution settlement introduced by the first New Labour administration, IPPR considers the political implications for the governance and stability of the UK. Two of its senior researchers, Michael Kenny and Guy Lodge, consider whether England is losing out in comparison with Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland by not having its own political institutions.
The authors show that it is not true that the English want their own parliament or wish to quit the Union. But they also demonstrate that a sense of English national identity is an increasingly important force within English social and political life, and can provide an important source of anti-political disaffection, if the political class continue to ignore or disapprove of a growing sense of Englishness.
This is a chapter from Breaking up Britain: Four nations after a Union, Edited by Mark Perryman, Published by Lawrence & Wishart (2009), ISBN 9781905007967. More sample chapters are available to download via the above link.
Related items
The great enabler: transport’s role in tackling environmental crises and delivering progressive change
In this special issue of IPPR Progressive Review we bring together leading political, academic and civil society thinkers to consider transport in modern Britain and its role in delivering a healthier, greener, more prosperous and…The shape of devolution
How do we create transparent, fair and practical footprints for local power across England?Everything everywhere, all at once: The need for a four nations approach to accelerate wind deployment in the UK
The UK is a world leader in wind deployment and has some of the most ambitious future wind capacity targets in the world, aiming for clean power by 2030.