The Limits to Limits: Is a cap on immigration a viable policy for the UK?
Article
As we approach a general election, all three main parties are keen to emphasise that they would be tough on immigration. The Liberal Democrats talk about a 'firm but fair system'; Labour emphasises its 'tough but flexible' Australian-style Points-Based System. But the Conservatives have gone a step further and have made a cap on immigration a headline policy. Although they have not set out the level at which such a cap might be set, they have talked about reducing annual net immigration below 100,000, and have also intimated their support for calls for annual net immigration to be reduced to around 40,000.
We should state from the outset that we think that a cap would be a bad idea, both in political and policy terms. We believe that immigration policy should be based on an assessment of the costs and benefits of migration, and on more effective communication with the public, rather than on a (more or less) arbitrary number. However, a cap is much discussed in the current political debate, and it is important to understand the implications of imposing one.
Related items
Mission-driven industrial relations: The case for fair pay agreements
How fair pay agreements could support the government’s mission-based approach by resolving labour market challenges.Women in Scotland: the gendered impact of care on financial stability and well-being
Women in Scotland are far likelier than men to take on childcare and other caring responsibilities, which puts them at an economic disadvantage.ÂCitizenship: A race to the bottom?
The ability to move from temporary immigration status to settlement, and ultimately to citizenship, is the cornerstone of a fair and functional immigration system.