The narrow corridor
Article
The Chancellor's ‘Winter Economic Plan’ included a redesigned version of the Job Retention Scheme – the Job Support Scheme. Together with the Job Retention Bonus (JRB), which is due to be paid out at the end of January, its purpose is “to protect viable jobs in businesses who are facing lower demand over the winter months due to coronavirus”.
With their current design, the JSS and JRB are unlikely to achieve this objective as they do not make it sufficiently profitable for firms to preserve viable jobs on a part-time basis over winter. We find that the new schemes will only save 230,000 of these jobs. As such, 1.8 million viable jobs which could otherwise be preserved will be lost, at great individual and wider economic cost.
To prevent these job losses the government should make the Job Retention Bonus (JRB) proportional to wages for hours worked part-time (up to a ceiling of £2500). This would replace the flat payment with a proportional one, paid in monthly instalments instead of a one-off. This ‘JRB+’ would have the advantage of benefitting those workers who need support and are outside the narrow corridor of wages for which the scheme currently acts as an incentive to keep workers on. The timing of the JRB+ should also be aligned with that of the JSS, to make sure that their joint benefits are effective until April.
Crucially, this is a design issue and not a question of overall funding. We estimate the JRB+ together jointly with the JSS would cost slightly less than the money set aside for the JRB.
Related items
Realism and progress: How should the UK think about international policy in 2024?
Given the current polls, the Labour party looks set to form the next government. It has taken the temperature of the country and, whereas in 1997 its leaders put hope at the heart of their campaign, this time they have chosen to focus on…Rock bottom: Low investment in the UK economy
The UK’s investment performance is still worse than every other G7 country, new data shows.There is an alternative to traditional ways of delivering social and economic value
Our new report An alternative is possible: Measuring the impact of cooperatives puts forward a new framework for measuring the value that cooperative organisations deliver to local economies.