Greasing the wheels: Getting our bus and rail markets on the move
Article
This report focuses on the relationship between public and private stakes in rail services, and differences between bus services in London and elsewhere.
Our analysis examines the pros and cons of existing policy for both of these transport markets. While policy for London buses seems to be performing reasonably well, there are challenges facing rail which need addressing, though these pale in comparison to those facing bus markets outside London.
Policy recommendations for rail cover:
- allowing public sector rail operators to compete for franchises, including as part of a joint venture with private companies
- handing responsibility for franchising decisions to the Office of Rail Regulation
- encouraging train operating companies (TOCs) to contribute more towards infrastructure costs and reduce the burden on taxpayers
Recommendations focused on bus services outside London include:
- giving greater powers and responsibilities to local bodies to shape local bus markets
- replicating the Transport for London (TfL) model at the city-region and combined authority level
- greater integration of transport spending and services by health and education providers (such as hospital shuttles and school buses)
- a new long-term, national transport strategy, to be written and owned by the Department for Transport.
Related items
Dr Parth Patel on BBC Politics Live - July 2024
IPPR's Dr Parth Patel on BBC Politics Live discussing the new Labour government, Covid, migration and international affairsA ‘mandate’ to deliver: Who voted Labour and what do they want?
This year’s general election saw the Labour party achieve a historic landslide, winning 218 new seats and a comfortable majority in the House of Commons.Half of us: Turnout patterns at the 2024 general election
One-half of adults in this country voted at the 2024 general election, the lowest share of the population to vote since universal suffrage.